North American
Kant Society

North American
Kant Society

  • Home
  • Announcements


<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 13 Nov 2016 12:29 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The NAKS Book Prize for Senior Scholars is the capstone of our system of Prizes. It is awarded to outstanding books in any aspect of Kant’s philosophy. Prior winners included:

    • 2016, Lucy Allais, Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism (Oxford University Press, 2015)
    • 2015, Julian Wuerth, Kant on Mind, Action and Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2014)
    • 2014, Pauline Kleingeld, Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

  • 29 Sep 2016 5:56 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Cambridge University Press is pleased to offer a 20% discount to NAKS members on its Kant titles. to browse titles and order, visit www.cambridge.org/NAKS16 .

  • 29 Sep 2016 5:48 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    After several decades of invaluable service, Paul Guyer has stepped down as President of the Advisory Board. On behalf of all members of the NAKS community, we want to express our sincerest gratitude for his steady and wise leadership over many years. Thank you!!!

    NAKS is also very happy to announce that Eric Watkins (UC San Diego) has agreed to be the new President of the Advisory Board. Eric served as Vice President of NAKS from 1998-2007, founded and co-organized the Pacific Study Group of NAKS from 2002-2012, and was appointed to the NAKS Advisory Board in 2014. He was a secondary editor of the Kant-Lexikon (2015), and has been a member of the Kant Komission of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences since 2012. He has written, translated, or edited Kant and the Sciences (2001), Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality (2005), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials (2009), Immanuel Kant: Natural Science (2012), The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives (2013), and Kant's Theory of Biology (2014). He has received fellowships from the NEH, NSF, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

  • 29 Sep 2016 5:47 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    NAKS would also like to express its sincere gratitude to the outgoing treasurer—Prof. Robert Hanna—for his great service to NAKS over the past many years. Thank you!

    NAKS is also very happy to announce that Professor Anne Margaret Baxley has accepted the invitation to serve as the new treasurer for NAKS. Baxley (Ph.D. UC-San Diego) is Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in Philosophy at Washington University in St. Louis, where she teaches courses on Kant, the history of ethics, and ethical theory. Her book entitled Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy was published by Cambridge University Press in 2010. She is currently working on a set of papers concerning Kant’s views on happiness and wellbeing. Baxley has been a Fellow at the National Humanities Center and The Center for Ethics and Public Affairs at the Murphy Institute at Tulane. She has received grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, the American Philosophical Society, and the American Association of University Women. Her articles on Kant’s practical philosophy have appeared in the Journal of the History of Philosophy, Kant-Studien, The Review of Metaphysics, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Inquiry, and The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

  • 29 Sep 2016 5:44 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    NAKS is very happy to announce that Lucy Allais has won the NAKS book prize for 2016 for her Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism.

    Lucy Allais is jointly appointed as Henry Allison Chair of the History of Philosophy at the University of San Diego, California and Professor of Philosophy at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (Wits). She did her undergraduate degree at Wits and post graduate degrees in Oxford. Her work on Kant has focussed on his transcendental idealism and issues to do with conceptualism in his epistemology, though she has also published on Kant on giving to beggars and on Kant’s racism. She also works on forgiveness as well as related issues to do with punishmentShe is currently working on Kant’s account of free will and the relation between this and issues to do with moral psychology and forgiveness. Her articles include ‘Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2009, 47, no. 3, pp 383–413, “Kant’s Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 45, no. 3,  2007, pp 459-84, “Wiping the slate clean: The Heart of Forgiveness,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2008, 36(1) pp 33–68, “Retributive Justice, Restorative Justice, and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39 (4), 2011 and “Freedom and Forgiveness” Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, volume 2 edited by Neal Tognazzini and David Shoemaker, 2014.

    Manifest Reality presents an interpretation of Kant’s transcendental idealism. One its central aims is to find a way of understanding Kant’s position that does justice to his being an idealist—his holding that physical objects in space and time depend on our minds in some sense and to some extent—at the same time as accommodating his explicit rejection of understanding this mind-dependence as anything like Berkelean idealism which sees physical objects as existing as constructions out of what exists merely in the mind. Further, the book aims to do this in a way that accommodates Kant’s holding that the things that appear to us have a way they are in themselves, independently of us, that grounds the way they appear to us, and which we cannot cognize. Finally, it aims to present an interpretation that illuminates the connections between transcendental idealism and Kant’s account of cognition, with respect to both empirical and metaphysical cognition. The book is divided into three parts. The first part goes through the basic textual claims Kant makes concerning transcendental idealism, as well as summarizing and responding to the main competing interpretations in the literature. Allais argues that the abundance of apparent textual evidence as well as philosophical considerations that can be appealed to in support of opposing interpretative extremes, as well as the fact that both have serious problems, seems to keep the literature in a state of oscillation between them. Many extreme idealist interpreters are rightly dissatisfied with deflationary readings that cannot do justice to the parts of the text in which Kant expresses his idealism; they frequently seem to assume that the only way to do justice to these texts is through seeing Kant as a phenomenalist. On the other hand, many deflationary and bare empirical realist interpreters are rightly dissatisfied with interpretations that see Kant as a phenomenalist, and from this they conclude that he is not an idealist.  She argues that to reach a stable interpretation we need an account of idealism that is not phenomenalist and that does justice to Kant’s empirical realism, and we need an account of what it means to say that things have a way they are in themselves which does not involve a commitment to intelligibilia.

    The second part of the book presents Allais’s positive account of the nature of the mind-dependence of Kantian appearances, as well as her account of Kant’s argument for the position. It also presents, as a central part of her approach, her way of understanding Kant’s central notion of intuition, the role intuition plays in cognition, and the relation between this and Kant’s idealism. The third part of the book presents Allais’s reading of Kant’s commitment to there being a way things are in themselves and the relation between this and his idealism about appearances as well as his empirical realism. She presents an account of his argument in the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories, one part of which she sees as compatible with realism, and as well as an account of the relation between Kant’s idealism and his explanation of the possibility of metaphysics. She sees the Deduction as containing an epistemological argument for the claim that applying the categories is a condition of referential empirical concept application. Kant then is able to convert this conditional claim about those objects we can cognize to a claim about all objects in space and time because he has already established that objects in space and time are limited to the conditions of our cognizing them. Thus, on her reading of the argument, transcendental idealism is not an explanation of cognition of synthetic a priori judgments in general. Rather, the explanation of the possibility of synthetic a priori cognition in geometry is a priori intuition. The idea of a priori intuition, and the role it plays in organising empirical intuition, leads to transcendental idealism. This has implications for how we understand the idealism, because it enables us to take seriously the role of the idealism in explaining the possibility of metaphysics without taking the explanation to be that it is because our minds ‘make’ objects in certain ways that we can know a priori claims about objects. Rather, the synthetic a priori claims are established as conditional claims about the conditions of empirical cognition; they are converted into unconditional claims about spatio-temporal objects once we grant that spatio-temporal objects do not exist independent of the possibility of our cognizing them.

  • 23 Apr 2016 5:22 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Oxford University Press is pleased to offer North American Kant Society members an exclusive 30% discount on all titles. Take advantage of this exclusive discount by entering promo-code AAFLYG6 at checkout when purchasing books from global.oup.com/philosophy

  • 23 Apr 2016 5:16 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The 2016-17 Walter de Gruyter Stiftung Kant Lecturer is Beatrice Longueness (New York University). Longueness will present her lecture at the 2017 Eastern Division meeting of the APA in Baltimore.

    De Gruyter has a long history of publishing Kant scholarship and embraces philosophical work in the Kantian tradition in the broadest sense. The de Gruyter Stiftung explicitly intends the Walter de Gruyter Stiftung Kant lecture series to be open to a broad approach to Kantian philosophy across the philosophical disciplines. This may also include contemporary philosophical work in the Kantian tradition. The Walter de Gruyter Stiftung Kant lecture series is offered every year at a divisional meeting on a rotating basis.

    More information about Walter de Gruyter Stiftung Kant Lecturer can be found here:


  • 24 Sep 2015 3:59 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The North American Kant Society is pleased to announce the seventh  annual Wilfrid Sellars Essay Prize competition. This prize will be awarded for the best essay on any topic that demonstrates the continued relevance of Kant’s philosophy. Essays must be single-authored, previously unpublished (work under consideration or forthcoming will be considered), and cannot exceed 8,000 words in length (including notes).

    The Wilfrid Sellars Essay Prize is the natural continuation of the existing Markus Herz Prize, which is awarded to the best graduate student submission to the NAKS study groups. The intention behind the Wilfrid Sellars Essay Prize is to help promote original Kantian or Kant-inspired philosophical work of scholars in the early stages of their careers. Submissions will be blind-reviewed and judged by members of a review committee drawn from the NAKS Executive and Advisory Boards.

    Deadline of submission: January 15, 2016.Wil

    Eligibility rules:

    ·        The essay must be written in English, single-authored, and has not been published by January 15, 2016.

    ·        “Junior” is defined here as: “PhD in hand; and 40 or younger (regardless of tenure status), or non-tenured (regardless of age).”

    ·        Authors must be members of NAKS at the time of submission.

    Please send entries electronically to:

    Pablo Muchnik


    Entries should be submitted in Wordformat and state the word count at the end. Submissions must be accompanied by a cover letter containing a three-part declaration stating that: (i) the essay has not been published by January 15, 2016, (ii) the author already has a PhD in hand, and is either 40 years of age or younger (regardless of employment status) or non-tenured (regardless of age), and (iii) the author is a member of NAKS in good standing.

    The winner will be announced on June 15 and will receive a prize of $500.  The Award Committee reserves the right not to award a prize, if in its judgment none is warranted.

  • 24 Sep 2015 3:56 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    NAKS is pleased to anounce the fourth Book Prize for Senior Scholars competition. This prize will be awarded for an outstanding book dealing with any aspect of Kant’s philosophy. Submissions will be judged by a panel consisting of members drawn from the NAKS Advisory Board, and the winner will receive a prize of $500. Deadline for submissions: December 31, 2016 (for books published throughJanuary 1 to December 31, 2016). The Awards Committee reserves the right not to award a prize, if in its judgment none is warranted. 

    Eligibility rules:

    ·    Only single-authored monographs or collections of essays written in English will be considered.

    ·    Authors must be members of NAKS at the time of submission.

    ·    Submission must be made by the publisher, and four (4) copies of the book must be submitted to NAKS. (Submissions should be sent to: Prof. Pablo Muchnik, Institute for Liberal Arts and Interdisciplinary Studies, Emerson College, 120 Boylston Street, 9th Floor (#907), Boston, MA 02116-4624.

    ·    Senior" is defined here as: "40 or older (regardless of tenure status), or tenured (regardless of age).”

    ·    Current NAKS Executive and/or Advisory Board Members are not eligible to compete for the prize.

  • 17 Jun 2015 1:10 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The judges for the 2015 Wilfrid Sellars Essay Prize are pleased to announce that the winner for this year’s competition is Mavis Biss, author of “Kantian Moral Striving.”

    Mavis Biss completed her PhD at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2011 and is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Maryland. She specializes in moral philosophy, with particular focus on Kantian ethics and conceptions of moral imagination. Her recent publications include: “Radical Moral Imagination: Courage, Hope and Articulation,” Hypatia (2013), “Moral Imagination, Perception and Judgment,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy (2014), and “Empathy and Interrogation,” International Journal of Applied Philosophy (2014). Her current work deals with the ideal of moral self-perfection in Kant’s ethics and the complexities of rational agency in the face of contested moral meaning.

    Abstract for “Kant’s Moral Striving:”

    The paper focuses on a single question that highlights some of the most puzzling aspects of Kant’s explanation of the duty of moral self-perfection. What kinds of activity count as striving for purity in one’s disposition to duty or strength of will? I argue that a dominant strand of Kant’s approach to moral striving does not fit familiar models of striving. I seek to address this problem in a way that avoids the flaws of synchronic and atomistic approaches to moral self-discipline by developing an account of Kantian moral striving as an ongoing contemplative activity complexly engaged with multiple forms of self-knowledge.

    The judges for the 2015 Wilfrid Sellars Essay Prize also gave an honorable mention to Reed Winegar for his “Kant's Criticisms of Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.”

    Reed Winegar is an assistant professor of philosophy at Fordham University. He received his BA from Harvard in 2005 and his PhD from the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. In 2015/16 he will be a VolkwagenStiftung/ Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in the Humanities at the Freie Universität in Berlin. His essay "Kant's Criticisms of Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion" is forthcoming in the British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Other published work has appeared (or is forthcoming) in the Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Hegel Bulletin, and Journal of Scottish Philosophy. His current research focuses on Kant's criticisms of metaphysics and on issues in Kant's 3rd Critique.

    Abstract for “Kant’s Criticisms of Hume’s Diaglogues concerning Natural Religion:”

    According to recent commentators, Kant agrees with Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1) that physico-theology can never provide knowledge of God and (2) that the concept of God, nevertheless, provides a useful heuristic principle for scientific enquiry. This paper argues that Kant, far from agreeing with Hume, criticizes Hume's Dialogues for failing to prove that physico-theology can never yield knowledge of God and that Kant correctly views Hume's Dialogues as a threat to, rather than an anticipation of, his own view that the concept of God provides a useful heuristic principle for science. The paper concludes that Kant's critique of physico-theology reflects Kant's deep dissatisfaction with Hume's manner of argumentation and suggests that Kant's attempt to provide a more successful critique of physico-theology merits continued philosophical attention.

    Both essays can be found in the members-only section of our website under “Sellars Prize”.    

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 

 2009-2015 North American Kant Society. All Rights Reserved.
The "North American Kant Society" is a 501(3)(c) non-profit organization. 2809 Kenyon Circle, Boulder, CO 80305.